Whether a judge denies a citizen his or her rights, or unjustly rules in favor of whomever bribed him, it is still theft.

BLACK-ROBED BANDITS

Injured Party - No Injured Party

The Courts can play it either way

Why do today's courts engage in discriminatory rulings against the very citizens whose welfare is at stake? Even on a collective basis, just look at the Supreme Court decisions on unleashing corporations on the campaign funding, and on their refusals to rule on the Obama birther issue. They don't operate for the good of society, and appear to follow a pre-arranged 'line'.

Injured Party - No Injured Party
Courts can play it either way.

Are you facing a stern judge in a commercial case with no injured party? Lose much of your possessions to a tax agency?

The courts may find that you must still pay a fine or citation, etc., even though you may argue there is no injured party, and the state cannot be an injured party.

However, the courts can play it the other way when it is convenient to them or when they are bribed. In the case of Kerchner vs Obama as Devvy Kidd notes:

"With unusual lightning speed, the appeals court decision issued:

Denied and possible monetary damages for bringing a frivolous lawsuit. (pg 7)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33824651/KERCHNER-v-OBAMA-Not-Precedential-Opinion-Transport-Room

"This court affirmed the order dismissing the suit, agreeing that “a candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters.” I d at 239 (quotation and citation omitted)."
End Devvy Kidd quote.

You see, we are considered frivolously bringing a lawsuit when there is an issue of the president's eligibility, even in this case where we have a Marxist thug 'ultimate-ACORN-nut' in the White House, (who is unlawfully passing executive orders which destroy this nation) who is not qualified to hold office of president.

Proof, again, that the criminal judges and justices who rule over Amerika are following a 'line' which is a double standard. Often they cannot find for a citizen, but, changing horses in midstream, uphold the current criminal in the White House. It is an indication of a completely separate, or foreign, operation within government operating beneath the surface.

Citizen cannot claim the state is not an injured party, but the court can claim the voters are not an injured party.

See: 'Federal judges sitting on critical cases is inexcusable' at: http://www.devvy.com/new_site/federal_judges_062910.html

and: Kerchner vs Obama Scribd doc at:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33824651/KERCHNER-v-OBAMA-Precedential-Opinion-Transport-Room

It was reported some time back that a court clerk in Louisiana committed suicide out of a depression which arose from unlawfully being ordered to refuse to file or recognize Common Law type pleas and filings. The clerk had, reportedly, been following orders to ignore or misfile honest filings for such a period of time it inflicted trauma and, no doubt, guilt.

This is just one result of the criminal nature of Amerika's judicial system. Why are the high level pedophiles receiving so much cover and protection and why were the banks (see Wachovia information) allowed to commit such money laundering for such an extended period of time? The black robed judges on many benches are undoubtedly criminals acting in a manner which enables the current 'CON' to roll on, right over the American People.

According to the following law brief which this editor read, in the matter of:

THE STATE OF IDAHO CASE NO. 75703
PLAINTIFF, 75704

VS

GEORGE GORDON
ACCUSED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA
MAGISTRATE DIVISION
BEFORE LEWIS WOODS, MAGISTRATE

Near the end of the transcript "THE COURT" actually stated, "I don't know what the rule is at this point, but that's the way I'm ruling at this point."

To which George Gordon responded, "Okay. Well then let the record show that I've been denied due process of law and that that will be my appealable issue pursuant to the 14th amendment that I'm not entering a plea and I've been denied my day in court."

THE COURT: "Okay. The record will so reflect." (Editor: In other words, get out of my courtroom - I don't give a damn.)

So there you have it. Why in the hell do lard butt, fat assed, so-called judges who don't know the law sit on court benches, still insisting on ruling the way they want to rule it? Or, isn't it the way they are paid to rule it!?

INFORMAMERICANET

This service has looked up the above listed court transcript for you as a service to show you specifically how today's American courts are not always what many would call competent. This is only one of many examples of such proceedings which was selected to illustrate, by example, that the information commented on here is for real, and that we do not conjure up fiction. More postings later.

Happy Fourth of July.

Also hear Devvy Kidd on www.renseradio.com If she isn't on go to 'Host Archives' in the left column and pull up her recent broadcast and others. Subscribe to Devvy's email list - http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/mail.cgi

HOME