Sprint Customers Cancel Contracts Without Penalty

AUTOPAY OPTION IS SIMILAR TO SECURITISATION OF INCOME

Much in the same vein as the federal government's attempt to 'securitize' your personal income to fund the criminal new healthcare plan; Sprint, the cell phone and phone service provider, has reportedly increased monthly bills by adding a surcharge of .40 per month to statements, as well as a penalty type of charge of $4.99 for those on a 'spending limit' plan. The spending limit plan is where subscribers have put up, a fee, say maybe $ 150.00 deposit, in place of having good or perfect credit, to establish a contract and service.

It goes without saying that poor people will be the most affected by these new dumb decisions of Sprint. Also, those who have paid their bills on time each month will receive the same treatment in these forms of penalties, that is...there seems to be no distinction between those who are prompt payers and those who are slow to no payers. To avoid paying the $4.99 monthly penalty for being on a spending limit plan subscribers can sign over some of their bank account for an automatic draw to pay the monthly bill with, a sort of securitising of a portion of the customer's income - similar to the securitisation of one's income which was attempted with the proposed new health care plans. Remember how the original proposals of the new health care plan had provisions and clauses proposed to criminalize citizens of a felony crime for not paying into the scheme?

Has the corporate-crazed OBAMANATION conceived these guarantee-gimmee-your-income plans all over America? Let's hope not, but there may be more to this new trend than meets the eye. It may involve the use of the social security number and how it relates to status, and how such statuses of citizens is used to investigate and prosecute citizens.

We already know from reading numerous websites and newspaper articles that Sprint and the other cell phone companies give thousands of replies to law enforcement on the whereabouts of various citizens when queries are sent to the companies, and may even give over emails and conversation content, and text messages, as well. Nowadays such queries may not necessarily be accompanied by full, legal, formal warrants or court orders, especially under the new unconstitutional Patriot Acts.

LINKING YOUR PERSONAL HISTORY TO A PHONE NUMBER

If we also know that much of our life history is accessible by law enforcement computers which identify us by our social security numbers, and such numbers are generally required to obtain driver licenses, bank accounts, and other accounts, then we can also reason that if a telephone account is linked to a bank account with the autopay option in order to avoid the $ 4.99 per month surcharge-penalty it may probably also link to the social security number automatically and the attached bank account could serve as a confirmation or verification of the customer's social security account number.

My Common Law book course states that the social security number 'grants jurisdiction', as in grants jurisdiction to prosecute, thus the innocent appearing autopay option may be serving a different purpose, indeed, than merely proving one's intent to pay the phone bill on time!

This law book information indicates that persons who do not have, nor use a social security number are regarded by law officials differently than persons who put the social security number up front and claim it.

If this information is true have you ever wondered why your BAR (British Accredited ?) Association Lawyer did not tell you about all of this? He/she may have sworn an oath not to reveal it. It is now rather common belief among some citizens that most BAR lawyers are working for the corporate type Admiralty Law, Police-Court, Executive Chancery type of U.S. law system which is foreign to the law of the land, The Constitution. The Constitution embraces Common Law which is the closest thing to biblical law. Corporations are foreign to Common Law.

Has Sprint opted to take a payoff from big government to collect all the social security numbers they possibly can? What kind of stipend were they offered which could have persuaded the stupid Sprint CEO's to go for this immoral, stupid, unjust crap?

WHY SHOULD YOU, THE AMERICAN CITIZEN APPRECIATE THESE CRAPPY COMPANIES AND CORPORATIONS THAT CONSTANTLY HAND OVER YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION TO A BUNCH OF SO-CALLED LAW ENFORCEMENT HOMELAND UNSECURITY BUMS WHO ALREADY DEMAND YOUR INCOME IN THE FORM OF THE UNLAWFUL (UNRATIFIED ACT) INCOME TAX?!

THESE SAME DAMN BUMS WHO MAKE A FORTUNE OFF OF SPYING ON WE THE CITIZENS HAVE INFILTRATED MUCH, IF NOT MOST, OF THE PRIVATE BUSINESS SECTOR AND BOUGHT OFF NETWORKS TO ISSUE ONLY THE NEWS AS THEY SEE IT. LOOK AT THE BIGGEST LAWSUIT IN HISTORY WHICH IS $3.87 TRILLION DOLLARS AGAINST THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WHICH WAS REPORTED TO 'THE WALL STREET JOURNAL' AND 'THE WASHINGTON POST' WHO DID NOT IMMEDIATELY PRINT AND REPORT IT!!!

THEY GO ON RAISING YOUR RATES AND CHARGING YOU TO HIDE MORE OF THEIR MURDERS, THEFTS, AND PHONY TERRORISM CREATIONS. LEADER OBAMA HAS BEEN LINKED TO THE USE OF UP TO 39 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS, AT LEAST ONE OF WHICH IS OF A DECEASED PERSON, BUT WOULDN'T YOU BE PROSECUTED IF YOU TRIED THAT?! THE D.C. BUMS LIVE ON A DOUBLE STANDARD BECAUSE YOU FUND THEM. STOP FUNDING THE BASTARDS NOW.