VISTA: Virtual
Instant Surveillance Tactical Application. Read
the nightmare here
AT&T Caught In
Massive Lawsuit
UPDATE: April 1, 2010
'Court Rejects Government's Executive Power Claims and Rules That Warrantless Wiretapping Violated Law' The court has again ruled that warrantless spying violates citizens.
AT&T Accused of Giving All Your AT&T Internet
Information To
National Security Agency Without Warrant, Violating The 4th
Amendment Rights of Millions.
April 14th,
2006, By Joe Martin
FROM www.informamerica.net
Late news on this
lawsuit at this link
http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_06.php#005304
UPDATE: EFF Wins Release of Telecom Lobbying Records Sept. 24, 2009
UPDATE: Electronic Frontier
Foundation Sues Again - September 18, 2008
UPDATE:
Judge
Tosses Telecom Spy Suits
- June 3, 2009
Original article was when suit began.
AT&T is being
sued in a class action lawsuit charging they illegally cooperated with
the National Security
Agency secret spy
program
essentially eavesdropping illegally on all information over the
internet of "millions of ordinary Americans".
The suit was filed by the Electronic Frontier
Foundation
stating AT&T's cooperation violates the right to free
speech
and privacy in the U.S. Constitution and
also
violates federal wiretapping law which
prohibits
electronic surveillance except as prescribed by law.
According to Kevin Bankston, EFF staff attorney,
it's
possible the Bush Administration will intervene for AT&T in the
case and expects a definite "fight with the government and
AT&T". (1.)
As most of us who have stayed
up on
the Bush-Cheney Regime already know, Bush
likes
Emergency War Powers Act type of power and invoking the
"state
secrets" doctrine, so it would come as
little
surprise if Bush invokes some of these
classified top
secret laws to help a corporation wriggle
out
of this mess. AT&T, apparently
afraid of
non-compliance with a veritable dictatorship, has
certainly
gotten its fat butt into a fine mess this time
which is
certain to cost AT&T stockholders
millions, if
not billions of dollars in lawyers fees and court costs and
possibly even in big settlements. If you have
unwisely
invested in such a company who violates the rights of American Citizens
in order to make a profit I'd say the message is clear: GET
OUT
NOW and SELL THAT AT&T STOCK NOW
!!!!!
DON'T INVEST IN COMPANIES AND CORPORATIONS WHICH
DEPEND ON
VIOLATING THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS TO MAKE A PROFIT.
DON'T
INVEST IN COMPANIES THAT ARE AFRAID OF BIG BULLY GOVERNMENT.
Naturally the Bush Regime Department of Justice only consented to
Electronic Frontier Foundation's filing the lawsuit documents under
seal, which is an established method
which
prevents public access and allows only
the
judge and litigants to see the
evidence.
While this may be considered an
established practice
you must admit this practice is similar
to the same
modus operandi of the legal quagmire
in
the Sibel Edmonds case where the rich
republican lawyers get to "fix
it up behind
closed doors" thus protecting the criminals in U.S.
Government at the highest
levels.
See this article, "Bush May
Face Impeachment
Hearings", by Joe Martin, Tues., Jan.
24th,
2006, from pages at "www.informamerica.net/". The
rich
certainly have their cozy clubs and
alliances to
keep themselves, their CEO's,
and lacky's
and corporations from falling through the
cracks, and
they use your tax payer dollars, of course, to pay for their
lawyers when honest citizens and groups stand up against their tyranny.
Assisting in this suit by the
EFF,
filed recently, which represents,
basically, all the
AT&T customers of America, are
the law
firms of Traber & Voorhees,
Lerach,
Coughlin, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins
LLP, and the
Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe. (2)
FOOTNOTES:
(
1.)
C/netNews.com
(
2.)
LinuxElectrons.com, and rense.com
White House Keeps Old Watch List
Sept. 6, 2009
In a similar vein, the current 'Obama, The Executor'
White House is seeking to keep terror-watch list data secret.
Intelligence officials in the administration are behind this
attempt, a further violation of citizens' rights, which would exempt
"terrorist identity information" from disclosure under The Freedom of
Information Act.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/05/AR2009090502240.html
HOME