I have seen your writing style for over a decade. You so easily expect the readers to eat the obfuscation you are dishing out relying on the reader to be easily naive whereby they do not see through your obfuscation.

Let me make it easy for all readers to break through your intentional misdirection:

1. If you have a basket of 40 apples and a basket of 200 oranges, if you audit the basket of apples you will find 40 apples and then you imply an audit of the fruit basket shows 40 apples, look no oranges!  The annual "Budget" is what government calls "The general purpose operating funds" (the apples)  The CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) shows all investments that have built up over decades, tax income, and enterprise income (The oranges and the apples) To refer to accounting from the general purpose operating funds exclusively which "is" a showing almost exclusively of the primary tax income with the exclusion of all the rest is perpetuating the gross misrepresentation game government has been playing now for over 65 years..

2. You casually use the term "no proof" hoping your reading audience is stupid and gullible enough to concur on face value of the statement made when in fact the primary showing on CAFR1.com is a showing of nothing but definitive proof of the composite totals amassed by government by listing, showing, and making available for downloading governments own city - county - state CAFR reports, US Treasury Auditor Generals Audit reports, government retirement CAFR reports. If you have done this unintentionally, then look and learn. If you have done this intentionally, eat and choke on your own poison.

3. ENRON promoted their profit and hid their debt. Government does the exact opposite, they promote their debt and hide their profit. They do so with the full cooperation of the syndicated media, controlled education, and both political parties DUE TO THE MONEY INVOLVED... They had one liability: they had to keep a record of their holdings and balance statements and to perpetuate their game they rammed the "Budget report" down the public's throat and worked diligently for not a peep of the CAFR. That old saying applied; If the largest tree in the forest fell and no one heard or saw it fall, did it actually fall? Your complete void of not bringing the core issues forward of the totals shown in the CAFR (now over 135,000) separate CAFR or AFR (Annual Financial Reports) produced by local government makes me strongly question your intent and motives behind your script of void seen here..

The TRF as brought forward on http://TaxRetirement.com is specifically designed to facilitate on a case by case basis an independent audit of local venues, a statistical review to bring government back to the "1965" standard after accounting for inflation and population increase, and most importantly of all the phasing out of all taxation through the use of the TRF fund principle of operation..